Aether And The Celestial Region

Celestial vs. Terrestrial Regions

 

Picture Source

Aristotle accepted the ideas of fire, air, earth, and water. He claimed them to be terrestrial elements due to their variable nature. These elements could be broken down into properties of hot, cold, dry, wet, light, and heavy, and by changing one or more of these properties, the elements themselves would change.  This was his explanation for changes of state. But Aristotle also believed in a constant celestial region consisting of unchanging cycles of star movement. To explain this behavior he added a fifth element to the mix, aether. This element was unchanging and indivisible.


Posted in Historical | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Aether And The Celestial Region

Black Hole Collisions

Even with little formal expertise about black holes, most people know that black holes are extremely powerful regions in space in which gravity “sucks in” everything around the black hole with no chance of escape.  Now imagine if two of these massive regions were to collide.  It is easy to infer that said collision would be catastrophic, but what exactly would happen?

The image above depicts an artist’s depiction of a black hole collision.  Though no one has ever witnessed this incredible event, Einstein’s general relativity theory helps us to understand that a collision of this sort would send massive gravitational waves rippling through space.  This article describes how experiencing gravitational waves of this kind would greatly benefit our knowledge of gravity.  Let’s just hope that these waves don’t send us for too much of a crazy ride in the process.


Posted in Physics, Universe | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Black Hole Collisions

Interferometry

The concept of interferometry is really cool to me.  The fact that multiple telescopes can be combined to make larger images makes perfect sense, but I have trouble wrapping my head around the idea that even though there are huge spaces (see this pic of the Very Large Array Telescope in New Mexico) in between the physical telescopes themselves, a full picture can still be formed.  I assume that because radio waves are so big, the spaces are not an issue, but it just seems unfathomable to me. So cool!


Posted in Instruments | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Interferometry

Hubble Images: Not as Easy as Just Taking Pictures

Most people have heard of the Hubble Space Telescope, a visible light telescope that has been orbiting Earth since 1990, and if they haven’t, they’ve probably at least seen some of it’s images of distant galaxies and majestic nebulae. These pictures are vibrantly colorful and awe-inspiring, but they don’t start off that way. All of Hubble’s images come back to Earth in black and white. The coloring process begins by compiling several black and white images of an astronomical feature that are specifically filtered to take in certain wavelengths of light. From there, the black and white photos are colorized and superimposed on one another to blend the colors together. Often these wavelengths correspond to emissions by certain elements and those elements will be assigned specific colors , so nebulae will look red where in areas dense in hydrogen and blue in areas dense in nitrogen. Thus, many of the things we see would not look the way they do in the photos if you were to visit in a spacecraft. However, some images are made to look realistic, like galaxies, but for the purpose of visibility and the definition of certain characteristics, most images are color-enhanced. NASA has a great video of the process that you can view, here. In my opinion, this practice isn’t particularly deceptive, but it may lead some people to believe that real astronomical features are this vibrant.


Posted in Instruments | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Hubble Images: Not as Easy as Just Taking Pictures

White Holes?

The idea of a black hole has been along for a long time, as a region in space having a gravitational field so intense that no matter can escape from it. These regions have not been directly discovered so to speak but there have been nearly inconclusive evidence that points to the existence of such objects. However, physicians like symmetry, no naturally why can there not be the existence of white holes?

White holes would be the exact opposite of black holes. They would expel matter and light and not be able to be entered from the outside

These objects were considered to be only hypothetical until an extraordinary event occured in 2006.

A gamma ray burst that happened did not make sense from where we thought they came from, and its duration suggested that it came from a supernova explosion. However, no supernova was known to exist near that area. A white hole could explain this event, as it spewed out the gamma ray and then collapsed upon itself to create the explosion. However, other than this event there has been no other observations of white holes, so the theory will have to remain in the dark for now.
This video by the history channel reiterates what has been previously stated and helps to further explain this unusual phenomenon:

White Holes – History Channel


Posted in Class | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on White Holes?

Conservation of Angular Momentum and Kepler’s Second Law

Conservation laws are very important laws for celestial objects in the universe. Without conservation laws, all these celestial objects will not obey predictable motions as they do in this universe. I am going to talk about conservation of angular momentum in this post.

Any objects orbiting or rotating have angular momentum. To change angular momentum of the object, we need to apply a “twisting force”, or torque. Conservation of momentum holds that the total angular momentum in a closed system is always conserved. With no external torque, an object can only change its angular momentum by transferring angular momentum to or from other objects in the system.

Most celestial objects have both orbital angular momentum and rotational angular. The conservation of orbital momentum actually explains Kepler’s second law of planetary motion. According Kepler’s second law of planetary motion, as a planet moves around its orbit, it sweeps out equal areas in equal time.

The formula for orbital angular momentum is: angular momentum = m*v*r
Where m is the mass of the object, v is the orbit speed of the object, and r is the radius of the orbit.

When applied to celestial objects, let’s imagine Earth orbiting the Sun. Because the angular momentum is conserved, and mass of Earth is unchanged, when Earth is closer to the Sun, i.e. the radius is smaller, the orbit speed must be greater, and vice versa. As a result, it sweeps out equal areas in equal time.


Posted in Class | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Conservation of Angular Momentum and Kepler’s Second Law

Dark Matter and the Missing Mass Problem

The predicted model of galactic rotation based on what we can see (line A) versus what is actually observed (line B); courtesy of Wikipedia.

We have a huge problem. Like a we-seem-to-be-missing-95%-of-the-universe kind of problem.  If you look at the way that galaxies are constructed you will notice that they are very bright in the center and tend to get dimmer as you travel outward, indicating there must be more mass in the center than the outside.  This would mean that the center of the galaxy should be spinning much faster than the outermost edges (represented by line A on the graph above), but that’s not what actually happens.  What we observe is that all points in a galaxy seem to rotate at about the same angular velocity (line B), which suggests that galaxies are actually in the shapes of discs with constant densities throughout.  We can’t see the matter that’s supposedly causing this, so… what’s happening?

The most commonly accepted theory is that the matter we can’t see is actually dark matter, a type of matter that acts like any other particle except for the fact that it doesn’t emit any detectable radiation. Under this theory, there are two main types of dark matter: baryonic and non-baryonic dark matter. Baryonic dark matter would be any kind of normal, everyday matter that is simply not being exposed to enough radiation for us to detect; for example, there could be a brown dwarf that is not a part of any solar system, just sitting out on its own in space. Because it has so little light to reflect, it would be all but imperceptible to us, technically rendering it dark matter. Black holes would qualify as well, as they emit no radiation.

The second, more theoretical type of dark matter is non-baryonic matter, which is a new type of matter entirely and is not composed of the traditional atoms as we know them. These types of particles would only interact with the Weak and Gravitational forces, meaning that it would not interact with any form of radiations and would therefore be unseeable by any direct means. The most convenient way to detect matter that is truly invisible would be to look at the gravitational effects around it, such as abnormal orbits of other bodies or the gravitational lensing effect on light.

While dark matter is still only a theoretical solution to the missing mass problem, it does offer a convenient explanation and the physical evidence we have does seem to support the theory. The major problem will be finding conclusive evidence of non-baryonic matter, and it is believed that the discovery of the Higgs boson will be a major step toward that goal.


Posted in Class | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dark Matter and the Missing Mass Problem

Using Paintballs to Deflect Asteroids

As you probably know on Friday February 15th there were two meteors heading Earth’s way. One of which crashed in Russia injuring over 1,000 people and the other missed Earth by 17,000 miles. The one that hit Russia was only 1.5 the size of a school bus while the other was 3 times that. Obviously the latter would’ve caused much greater damage, so what could be done to avoid an asteroid of that size to hit Earth?

The first step is to find it which is not so easy. NASA says that it has tracked about 95% of the asteroids more than a half-mile wide, but when it comes to anything smaller than that, NASA has only located 1% of near-Earth asteroids. The one that flew by Earth was detected a year ago, so what would’ve been our options if it was on a collision course?

There are five solutions that have been proposed to stop asteroids. The most interesting one is to shoot white paint balls at it which would double its reflectivity. This would hopefully increase the solar radiation pressure enough to change the asteroids path. For more information on the other four methods visit this site.


Posted in Small SS Objects | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Using Paintballs to Deflect Asteroids

Neutrino Detectors

A representation of a neutrino interaction in the Super-Kamiokande detector.

Over the past several decades telescope technology has improved dramatically. Not only are we able to view the galaxy from massive observatories on Earth, but we can capture light through telescopes orbiting in space. Although these advances have allowed us to detect light from many different ranges across the electromagnetic spectrum, telescopes cannot detect all the information being sent to us from the cosmos. Detecting light only gives us part of the story of the universe. In order to expand our view of space we must observe other particles traveling through space, which is exactly the purpose of neutrino detectors.

Neutrinos are extremely small particles which do not interact with matter very often, making them extremely hard to detect. In fact, neutrinos can pass straight through Earth without even interacting with any matter at all. Neutrino detectors must be very large and experiments must run for a long time in order to detect any neutrinos.

There are several different types of detectors, but the largest one is the Super-Kamiokande detector in Japan. This device is a giant sealed pit filled with 50,000 tons of water and lined with thousands of light detectors. Some neutrinos will interact with the water, producing small amounts of light. This light is then detected by the sensors that line the pit. Another type of neutrino detector cools Argon gas to liquid form and relies on interactions between the liquid argon and passing particles to detect neutrinos. One of these types of detectors is currently being built and tested at Fermilab. There it will be buried into a hillside and covered in shielding in order to escape the effects of cosmic radiation.

In conclusion, astronomical observation does not only rely on instruments like telescopes, but also other particle detectors. The detectors are relatively new technology which we hope to see improve just as the telescope progressed over the centuries.

 


Posted in Instruments | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Neutrino Detectors

Archeoastronomy and Stonehenge

An image of Stonehenge, courtesy of Wikipedia

Archeoastronomy is not as the name at first implies a study of ancient astronomy, but rather the study of how astronomy affected early civilizations. In a sense, it is a combination of astronomy, anthropology, and history with respect to ancient cultures. Archeoastronomers look at a variety of types of evidence in their efforts to determine the astronomical beliefs or practices of a ancient culture, one of the most common of which is architecture; this is often the case due to the prevalence and longevity of ancient buildings with respect to other artifacts from ancient cultures.

Stonehenge, the ancient monument standing in Wiltshire, England, is thought by many to have held great astronomical significance with the civilization that built it. It is a circle of intentionally-carved-and-arranged stones about 33 meters (~108 feet) in diameter dating back somewhere between 4000 and 5000 years ago. Some researchers believe that the site may have been renovated or rebuilt five or more times during the first thousand or so years of its existence. One of the stones is believed to be aligned such that it would approximately line up with the sunrise of the summer solstice, and the sun’s light would shine over the top of the stone and into the center of the stone circle. Several other alignments with the sun, moon, and stars can be seen with the different stone pillars, enough to suggest it is more than mere coincidence.

Several astronomers have posed theories as to the original purpose of Stonehenge. Gerald Hawkins, author of the study Stonehenge Decoded, believes that it may have been used for predicting solar and lunar eclipses. Alexander Thom, an engineer and archeological researcher, has also theorized that it may have been some type of prehistoric calendar based around the position of the sun. Although it is unknown whether or not we will eventually discover the true nature of Stonehenge, these theories do put into perspective the relatively advanced scientific capabilities of early man.


Posted in Class | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Archeoastronomy and Stonehenge