<\/p>\n
In analyzing Mary Shelley\u2019s Frankenstein, <\/em>overemphasis is given to the relationship between Victor and his creation, while ignoring the surrounding cast of characters. This overemphasis skews moral and philosophical analysis of both Victor and his creation; as characters such as Elizabeth, Clerval, and Justine pose important moral questions in relation to the text, as well as to Victor and the monster themselves. \u00a0For this response, we will focus on the character of Clerval.<\/p>\n An easily overlooked character in analyzing Frankenstein <\/em>is that of Henry Clerval. In contrast to both Victor and the Monster, Clerval seeks distinction on the ethical merits of his actions, as opposed to scientific distinction or the monster\u2019s desire for approval. Victor states of Clerval, \u201c(that) \u201chis hope and his dream was to become one among those whose names are recorded in story as the gallant and adventurous benefactors of our species\u201d (Shelley 31). This places Clerval as an interesting foil to both Victor and the monster – Clerval provides a gallant, almost satirical standard by which to measure both. The parody-like nature of Clerval is not lost on Shelley; in later stages of the novel, Clerval\u2019s newfound interest in science causes Victor to note, \u201cin Clerval I saw the image of my former self\u201d (Shelley 170). Clerval\u2019s pure appreciation of science and nature provides a stark contrast to Victor\u2019s twisted understanding. In relation to the monster, Clerval represents everything he is not \u2013 well bred, attractive, and universally welcomed.<\/p>\n However, Shelley\u2019s ultimate note on Clerval is subdued \u2013 his death becomes a quick after-note in the rapidly unfolding conflict between Frankenstein and the monster. While it\u2019s much better handled in a response of greater length, Clerval poses an interesting moral standard by which to measure both Frankenstein and the monster. <\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In analyzing Mary Shelley\u2019s Frankenstein, overemphasis is given to the relationship between Victor and his creation, while ignoring the surrounding cast of characters. This overemphasis skews moral and philosophical analysis of both Victor and his creation; as characters such … Continue reading