{"id":3457,"date":"2023-09-06T11:38:57","date_gmt":"2023-09-06T16:38:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/?p=3457"},"modified":"2023-09-06T11:44:36","modified_gmt":"2023-09-06T16:44:36","slug":"characterizing-streamline-count-invariant-graph-measures-of-structural-connectomes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/2023\/09\/characterizing-streamline-count-invariant-graph-measures-of-structural-connectomes\/","title":{"rendered":"Characterizing Streamline Count Invariant Graph Measures of Structural Connectomes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nancy R. Newlin, Francois Rheault, Kurt G. Schilling,\u00a0Bennett A.\u00a0<span class=\"markcxj1f6r07\">Landman<\/span>. &#8220;Characterizing Streamline Count Invariant Graph Measures of Structural Connectomes&#8221; Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. January 2023.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/jmri.28631\">Full Text<\/a><\/p>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0001\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0001-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Background<\/h3>\n<p>While graph measures are used increasingly to characterize human connectomes, uncertainty remains in how to use these metrics in a quantitative and reproducible manner. Specifically, there is a lack of community consensus regarding the number of streamlines needed to generate connectomes.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0002\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0002-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Purpose<\/h3>\n<p>The purpose was to define the relationship between streamline count and graph-measure value, reproducibility, and repeatability.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-3458 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\n2661\/2023\/09\/Figure1_revised-300x107.gif\" alt=\"Figure1_revised\" width=\"698\" height=\"249\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure1_revised-300x107.gif 300w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure1_revised-768x274.gif 768w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure1_revised-650x232.gif 650w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 698px) 100vw, 698px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0003\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0003-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Study Type<\/h3>\n<p>Retrospective analysis of previously prospective study.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0004\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0004-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Population<\/h3>\n<p>Ten healthy subjects, 70% female, aged 25.3\u2009\u00b1\u20095.9\u2009years.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0005\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0005-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Field Strength\/Sequence<\/h3>\n<p>A 3-T, T1-weighted sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with two gradient strengths (<i>b<\/i>-values\u00a0=\u00a01200 and 3000\u2009sec\/mm<sup>2<\/sup>, echo time [TE]\u00a0=\u00a068\u2009msec, repetition time [TR]\u00a0=\u00a05.4\u00a0seconds, 120 slices, field of view\u00a0=\u00a0188\u2009mm<sup>2<\/sup>).<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0006\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0006-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Assessment<\/h3>\n<p>A total of 13 graph-theory measures were derived for each subject by generating probabilistic whole-brain tractography from DWI and mapping the structural connectivity to connectomes. The streamline count invariance from changes in mean, repeatability, and reproducibility were derived.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0007\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0007-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Statistical Tests<\/h3>\n<p>Paired\u00a0<i>t<\/i>-test with\u00a0<i>P<\/i>\u00a0value &lt;0.05 was used to compare graph-measure means with a reference, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to measure repeatability, and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to measure reproducibility.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0008\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0008-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Results<\/h3>\n<p>Modularity and global efficiency converged to their reference mean with ICC\u2009&gt;\u20090.90 and CCC\u2009&gt;\u20090.99. Edge count, small-worldness, randomness, and average betweenness centrality converged to the reference mean, with ICC\u2009&gt;\u20090.90 and CCC\u2009&gt;\u20090.95. Assortativity and average participation coefficient converged with ICC\u2009&gt;\u20090.75 and CCC\u2009&gt;\u20090.90. Density, average node strength, average node degree, characteristic path length, average local efficiency, and average clustering coefficient did not converge, though had ICC\u2009&gt;\u20090.90 and CCC\u2009&gt;\u20090.99. For these measures, alternate definitions that converge a reference mean are provided.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0009\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0009-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\">Data Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>Modularity and global efficiency are streamline count invariant for greater than 6 million and 100,000 streamlines, respectively. Density, average node strength, average node degree, characteristic path length, average local efficiency, and average clustering coefficient were strongly dependent on streamline count.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0010\" class=\"article-section__content\">\n<h3 id=\"jmri28631-sec-0010-title\" class=\"article-section__sub-title section1\"><\/h3>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"jmri28631-sec-0011\" class=\"article-section__content\"><\/section>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-3461 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\n2661\/2023\/09\/FigureX2_revised-300x153.png\" alt=\"FigureX2_revised\" width=\"745\" height=\"380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/FigureX2_revised-300x153.png 300w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/FigureX2_revised-768x393.png 768w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/FigureX2_revised-650x332.png 650w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/FigureX2_revised.png 1723w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 745px) 100vw, 745px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-3459 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\n2661\/2023\/09\/Figure5_revised-198x300.png\" alt=\"Figure5_revised\" width=\"569\" height=\"862\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure5_revised-198x300.png 198w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure5_revised-768x1162.png 768w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure5_revised-430x650.png 430w, https:\/\/cdn-dev.vanderbilt.edu\/t2-my-dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2304\/2023\/09\/Figure5_revised.png 911w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 569px) 100vw, 569px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nancy R. Newlin, Francois Rheault, Kurt G. Schilling,\u00a0Bennett A.\u00a0Landman. &#8220;Characterizing Streamline Count Invariant Graph Measures of Structural Connectomes&#8221; Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. January 2023. Full Text Background While graph measures are used increasingly to characterize human connectomes, uncertainty remains in how to use these metrics in a quantitative and reproducible manner. Specifically, there is&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9288,"featured_media":3458,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[196,195,132,82,1,40,49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-complex-network-analysis","category-connectomics","category-harmonization","category-magnetic-resonance-imaging","category-news","category-reproducibility","category-tractography"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9288"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3457"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3457\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3468,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3457\/revisions\/3468"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/masi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}