{"id":21,"date":"2011-08-12T10:33:20","date_gmt":"2011-08-12T15:33:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/?page_id=21"},"modified":"2011-09-15T16:54:50","modified_gmt":"2011-09-15T21:54:50","slug":"papers","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/papers\/","title":{"rendered":"Papers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/analyzing_action_agents_killingsworth.pdf\">Killingsworth, S., Saylor, M.M., Levin, D.T. (2011). Analyzing Action for Agents with Varying Cognitive Capacities.Social Cognition, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2011, pp. 56-73.<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"line-height: normal\"><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/youngchildren_hybrids_saylor.pdf\">Saylor, M.M., Somanader, M., Levin, D.T., Kawamura, K. (2010). How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: The case of humanoid robots. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 835-851.<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/Levin_et_al-Distinguishing.pdf\">Levin, D.T., Saylor, M.M., Lynn, S.D. (in review). Distinguishing first-line defaults and second-line conceptualization in reasoning about humans, robots, and computers.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/audience_contingent_herberg.pdf\">Herberg, J. S., Saylor, M. M., Ratanaswasd, P., Levin, D. T., Levin, D. T., &amp; Wilkes, D. M. (2008). Audience-contingent variation in action demonstrations for humans and computers. Cognitive Science, 32, 1-19.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/Concepts_Capabilities_Levin.pdf\">Levin, D.T., Killingsowrth, S.S., and Saylor, M.M. (2008). Concepts about the capabilities of computers and robots: a test of the scope of adults&#8217; theory of mind. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM\/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. New York, NY.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/ThinkingAboutThinking_Levin.pdf\">Levin, D.T., Saylor, M.M., Varakin, A., Gordon, S.M., Kawamura, K., &amp; Wilkes, M. (2006). Thinking about thinking in Computers, Robots, and people. Poster presented at the Association for Psychological Science conference, New York, NY.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/Student_Computers_Vazquez.pdf\">Vazquez, M.D., Saylor, M.M., &amp; Levin, D.T. (2010). Student computers: six-year-olds believe that computers can learn.Poster presented at the International Conference on Development and Learning. Ann Arbor, Michigan.<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/Conceptual_Change_Levin.pdf\">Levin, D.T., Steger, A.P., Lynn, S.D., Adams, J.A. (in review). Conceptual Change in Beliefs About Agency: The Joint Roles of Deep Concept Availability and Cognitive Dissonance<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/89\n1169\/2011\/08\/Remote_Control_Somanader.pdf\">Somanader, M., Saylor, M.M., &amp; Levin, D.T. (2011). Remote control and children&#8217;s understanding of robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 239-247.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Killingsworth, S., Saylor, M.M., Levin, D.T. (2011). Analyzing Action for Agents with Varying Cognitive Capacities.Social Cognition, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2011, pp. 56-73. Saylor, M.M., Somanader, M., Levin, D.T., Kawamura, K. (2010). How do young children deal with hybrids of living and non-living things: The case of humanoid robots. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":101,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21\/revisions\/101"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/my.dev.vanderbilt.edu\/daniellevin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}